Factors associated with participation in phase 1 and phase 3 oncology trials
There is a lack of both philosophical analysis and empirical support of for patients views to guide the selection of appropriate information and consent procedures for patients with progressive cancer.
A common conception is that patients participate in order to reap benefits of their own, while the scientific objective is to benefit future patients, i.e. the therapeutic misconception. However, the concept of benefit is complex and there are different ways patients may perceive their participation. There is a need of empirical studies that focus specifically on the balancing of benefits and risks, the issue of voluntariness and the role of doctors and research associates in promoting patient autonomy for clinical cancer trials. In particular, there is a lack of information on these issues from the perspective of the Swedish health care system and how Swedish patients reason.
The aim of this project is to understand on what premises Swedish patients decide to participate in phase 1 and phase 3 oncology trials with emphasis on their attitudes regarding risk, own benefits and benefits for future patients. We will also investigate the implications of this understanding for information and consent procedures used when recruiting patients to such trials.
In this project we want to find answers to the following questions:
- How do cancer patients participating in phase 1 and phase 3 clinical trials perceive their participation with regard to risk, benefits (own and for future patients) and information?
- What is their perception of the role of physicians and clinical research associates with regard to recommendations to participate, success of information transfer, time assigned for making decision?
- Do they regard their participation as voluntary and on what conditions would they like to withdraw?
- Is willingness to participate related to patients’ quality of life?
- How may the risk of treatment/therapy misconception be handled in association with randomized controlled clinical cancer trials?
The project consists of two parts: interviews with phase 1 trial participants and, using the results from these interviews, a questionnaire to patients who participate in phase 3 trials.
Godskesen, T. (2015). Patients in Clinical Cancer Trials: Understanding, Motivation and Hope. Dissertation
Godskesen, T., Hansson, M., Nygren, P., Nordin, K., Kihlbom, U. (2015). Hope for a cure and altruism are the main motives behind participation in phase 3 clinical cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer Care, vol. 24, ss. 133-141 DOI
Godskesen, T., Kihlbom, U., Nordin, K., Silen, M., Nygren, P. (2015). Differences in trial knowledge and motives for participation among cancer patients in phase 3 clinical trials. European Journal of Cancer Care DOI
Godskesen, T., Nygren, P., Nordin, K., Hansson, M., Kihlbom, U. (2013). Phase 1 clinical trials in end-stage cancer: patient understanding of trial premises and motives for participation.Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 21, ss. 3137-3142
Tove Godskesen started her PhD studies in October 2010 after advanced level studies in both Caring Sciences and Public Health. She is a registered nurse (2006) and has worked at the Akademiska sjukhuset (Uppsala University Hospital) hematology clinic. Her PhD project deals with participation in phase 1and phase 3 oncology trials. She defended her thesis in August 2015.
- Ulrik Kihlbom, Senior lecturer in Medical Ethics
- Karin Nordin, Professor, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences,
- Peter Nygren, Professor, Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science
This PhD project was funded by The Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden).
Sjuksköterskor måste hantera etiska problem i stt dagliga arbete. Men vård och omvårdnad har också en moralisk dimension.
Vi forskar om hälso- och sjukvården och de människor som befinner sig där: både de som arbetar där och patienterna.
Inflytande genom lek: Barn med cancer
Barn med cancer får sällan delta i beslut om sin vård och behandling. Just nu driver vi ett pilotprojekt om föreställande lek kan hjälpa de här barnen deras familjer.
Vårdetik och omvårdnadsetik
Relalationen mellan sjuksköterska och patient är inte jämlik. Hur ser man till att mötet ändå blir respektfullt? Vilka etiska dilemmans uppstår i sjuksköterskors vardag? Och hur kan man lösa dem?