Preliminary programme: Monday June 14
Should ideology be allowed to trump patient well-being?
Plenary session
| 09:00 | Introduction |
| 09:15 | Moral conflicts reconsidered: Respect for the patient as individual and the duty to care for all |
| 09:50 | How to avoid a dichotomy between “autonomy” and “beneficence”? From liberalism to communitarianism and beyond Margit Sutrop Institute for Philosophy and Semiotics & Centre for Ethics, University of Tartu, Estonia Abstract > |
| 10:20 | Break |
| 10:50 | Keynote response Alastair V. Campbell Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore |
| 11:20 | Response and panel discussion |
| 11:35 | Open discussion |
| 12:30 | Lunch |
The afternoon programme consists of four parallel sessions:
- Extra session on stem cell ethics
- Science, economy and ideology
- Contexts and experiences
- Best interests reconsidered
I. Extra session on stem cell ethics
| 13:30 | New ethical challenges in stem cell research |
| 14:20 | Doing ethics: A reflection on the ethical review of stem cell science by research ethics committees in the UK |
| 14:40 | Coffee |
| 15:10 | Ethical issues in stem cell research in Ireland |
| 15:35 | Legal and ethical controversies around medical uses of stem cells |
| 16:00 | Stem cells and metaphysics |
II. Science, economy and ideology
| 13:30 | Should ideology be allowed to trump wellbeing? The example of evidence based medicine |
|
|
| 13:55 | Patient equality: to treat alike or take account of the difference? |
|
|
| 14:20 | A Singaporean case study on the effect of culture on medical decision making at the end of life |
|
|
| 14:40 | Coffee |
|
|
| 15:10 | "The Actor Model" - A valuable tool in difficult ethical decisions |
|
|
| 15:35 | Hunger strike: bravery, despair or blackmail? |
|
|
| 16:00 | Ethical issues with the development of personalised medicines for rare, childhood, genetic disease: the case of duchenne muscular dystrophy |
III. Contexts and experiences
| 13:30 | Patients' perceptions of bad treatment and of feeling wronged in Swedish healthcare |
|
|
| 13:55 | The role of medical ethics in chronic illness experience of older adults: Latvian case |
|
|
| 14:20 | The scarcity of autonomous choice in clinical medicine |
|
|
| 14:40 | Coffee |
|
|
| 15:10 | CANCELLED |
|
|
| 15:35 | Ideological beliefs, death and medical diagnosis |
|
|
| 16:00 | West meets east: western standards for HIV testing meets Chinese duty-based confucianism |
IV. Best interests reconsidered
| 13:30 | Is medical ethics really in the best interest of the patient - An Asian perspective |
|
|
| 13:55 | The "Patient's Best Interest" and clinical prudence reconsidered |
|
|
| 14:20 | Infantile surgery for intersex - is it in the best interests of the child or, as many present day patient advocates suggest, should it be regarded as complying with a suspect norm? |
|
|
| 14:40 | Coffee |
|
|
| 15:10 | If we can, must we? Is there an evolving best interest of the child? |
|
|
| 15:35 | From autonomy to vulnerability: How medical ethics’ paradigms produce their respective ideas of the patient’s best interest |
|
|
| 16:00 | Don’t lie! – Why not? How to argue for truthfulness in medical practice |
Organisers
The conference is arranged by Cesagen at the universities of Lancaster and Cardiff and the Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics at Uppsala University.
The Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics is an interfaculty centre at Uppsala University.
Cesagen is a collaborative research centre which is funded as part of the ESRC Genomics Network. The Centre is based at the universities of Lancaster and Cardiff.






