Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics
Is medical ethics really in the best interest of the patient?

Preliminary programme: Wednesday June 16

Ethical review boards: important ethical safeguards or over-burdensome and unnecessary bureaucracy?


Plenary session

 

09:00 Introduction
 
09:15 Are Research Ethics Committees Working in the Best Interests of Participants in an Increasingly Globalised Research Environment?
Don Chalmers
Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Australia
Abstract >
 
09:50 Estimating the Deaths from Research Regulation
Simon Whitney
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, USA
Abstract >
   
10:20 Break
 
10:50 Keynote response
Søren Holm
Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Manchester University, United Kingdom
   
11:20 Response and panel discussion
 
11:35 Open discussion
 
12:30 Lunch
   

 

The afternoon programme consists of four sessions: two consecutive and three parallel:

  1. The legitimacy and function of ethical review boards
    [13:30-14:40]
  2. Ethical review boards and research
    [15:10-16:25]
  3. Challenges facing ethical review boards
  4. The norms and values of ethical review boards

I. The legitimacy and function of ethical review boards   

 

13:30

Who guards the guardian? A critical analysis of the legal legitimacy of institutional review boards
Wenmay Rei
National Yang-Ming University, Division of Law and Policy, Institute of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
Abstract >

 

 

13:55

Ethical review: what place for law, regulation and governance?
Kay Wheat
Nottingham Trent University, Law, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Abstract >

 

 

14:20

Ethical review board "light" for research projects using codified human tissues
Hans-Anton Lehr 1; Stephan Schaefer 1; Michel Burnier 2
1University of Lausanne, CHUV, Department of Pathology, Lausanne, Switzerland; 2University of Lausanne, CHUV, President, Ethical Review Board, Lausanne, Switzerland
Abstract >

 

 

14:40

Coffee

   

II. Ethical review boards and research

 

15:10

Systematic distrust promoting trust? The ethics committee and biobank research
Bjørn K. Myskja
Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Department of Philosophy, Trondheim, Norway
Abstract >

 

 

15:35

Global standards for Research Ethics Committees: Presentation of Draft document and request for feedback
Abha Saxena
World Health Organization, Research Policy and Cooperation, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva, Switzerland
Abstract>

 

 

16:00

The influence of the EU-directive on the quality of non-commercial clinical trials in Sweden
Agneta Cruz Galdo
Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Trial Alliance, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract >

 

III. Challenges facing ethical review boards

 

13:30

The minimal risk controversy
Michael Yeo
Laurentian University, Philosophy, Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Canada
Abstract >

 

 

13:55

The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: Unanswered dilemmas
Leslie London 1; David C. Coggon 2; Angelo Moretto 3; Martin Wilks 4; Peter Westerholm 5; Claudio Colosio 6
1University of Cape Town, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Cape Town, South Africa; 2University of Southampton, School of Medicine, MRC Epidemiology Resource Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom; 3University of Milan, Department of Environmental and Occuaptional Health, International Centre of Pesticide and Health Risk Prevention, Milan, Italy; 4Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT), Director, Basel, Switzerland; 5Uppsala University, Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala, Sweden; 6University of Milan, Department of Occupational Health, International Centre of Rural Health, Milan, Italy
Abstract >

 

 

14:20

Informed consent and ethic committees in the midst of a natural disaster
Lior Zeller 1; Carmi Bartal 2; Alan Jotkowitz 1
1Soroka University Medical Center/BGU, Medicine, Beersheva, Israel; 2Soroka University Medical Center/BGU, Emergency Medicine, Beersheva, Israel
Abstract >

 

 

14:40

Coffee

 

 

15:10

The diverse ethics of translational research
Neema Sofaer 1; Nir Eyal 2
1King’s College London, Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, School of Law, London, United Kingdom; 2Harvard University, Program in Ethics and Health, Dept of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
Abstract >

 

 

15:35

Application of ethical matrix for ethical review of research projects in public health. A European prospective
Ioana Rodica Ispas
University of Bucharest, Center for Applied Ethics, Bucharest, Romania
Abstract >

 

 

16:00

Rethinking ethical boundaries of grounded theory approach
Barbara Potrata
University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Abstract >

 

IV. The norms and values of ethical review boards

 

13:30

The role of ELSI research in science projects
Choon Key Chekar
Cesagen, Cardiff University, Cesagen, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Abstract >

 

 

13:55

Judging or improving research proposals? The meeting of two logics in ethical review meetings
Jean Philippe de Jong ; Dick Willems ; Myra van Zwieten
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Medical Ethics, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract >

 

 

14:20

Demanding informed consent from critically ill patients may result in discrimination: A case report from a study on patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm
Martin Björck
Uppsala University, Dep of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract >

 

 

14:40

Coffee

 

 

15:10

The trouble with ethics: refocusing analysis
Karolyn White1; Mianna Lotz2
1Macquarie University, Research Office, North Ryde, Australia; 2Macquarie University, Philosophy, North Ryde, Australia
Abstract >

 

 

15:35

What kind of projects medical research ethics committees judge?
Elina Hemminki 1; Jorma Virtanen 2; Piret Veerus 2
1National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; 2University of Helsinki, Department of Public Health, Helsinki, Finland
Abstract >

 

 

16:00

Biobank research based on presumed consent
John-Arne Skolbekken
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Social work and health science, Trondheim, Norway
Abstract >



Organisers

The conference is arranged by Cesagen at the universities of Lancaster and Cardiff and the Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics at Uppsala University.

The Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics is an interfaculty centre at Uppsala University.

Uppsala universitet

Cesagen is a collaborative research centre which is funded as part of the ESRC Genomics Network. The Centre is based at the universities of Lancaster and Cardiff.

Cesagen Cardiff University Lancaster University

In collaboration with:

Akademiska sjukhuset

Main sponsor:

Journal of Internal Medicine

More information