Pär Segerdahl investigates the often polarized ethical debate on embryonic stem cell research and explores more open-minded and contemplative ways of handling moral concerns about embryo destruction and donation for research. He holds a PhD in theoretical philosophy from Uppsala University (1993). He has previously investigated notions of nature and animals in animal ethics, animal welfare and philosophy, as well as in culture more generally. He was a guest researcher at the Centre for Gender Research at Uppsala University from 2007-2009, and 2013-2017 he worked part time there in the project “Becoming ‘human’: gender theory and animals in a more-than-human world.” Pär Segerdahl became associate professor of theoretical philosophy at Åbo Akademi University in 1998 and at Uppsala University in 2001. All his work concerns, in one way or another, the question what philosophy is and what it means to philosophize. Pär Segerdahl is involved in research communication for, among others, the Human Brain Project. He is the editor of The Ethics Blog and Etikbloggen.
Phone: +46 18-471 61 72
Pär Segerdahl on the Ethics Blog
- Safeguards when biobank research complies with the General Data Protection Regulation 2022-05-17
- Using surplus embryos to treat Parkinson’s disease: perceptions among the Swedish public 2022-05-03
- Can consumers help counteract antimicrobial resistance? 2022-04-05
- Fact resistance, human nature and contemplation 2022-03-22
- Illness prevention needs to be adapted to people’s illness perceptions 2022-03-01
- Images of good and evil artificial intelligence 2022-02-15
- Individualized treatment from the patient’s perspective 2022-02-01
- Digital twins, virtual brains and the dangers of language 2022-01-18
- Inspired 2021-12-21
- Co-authorship when not everyone’s research is included in the paper 2021-11-30
ELSI-Service for BBMRI.se
We have run ELSI-Services for BBMRI.se (BioBanking and Molecular Resource Infrastructure of Sweden): a national effort for efficient and automated collection of biological material funded by the Swedish Research Council. Now replaced by Biobank Sweden.
Handling incidental findings
How should we handle incidental findings in biobank and -omics research? Jennifer Viberg Johansson's PhD project examined the arguments for and against disclosure of incidental findings.
Stem cell treatment of type 1 diabetes
We provide ethical and legal analysis and guidance on development of products for treating type 1 diabetes, using cells derived from human embryonic stem cells.
Neuroethics & Neurophilsophy
Any attempt at understanding how the mind and the brain work comes with a set of philosophical, ethical and social issues.
The Human Brain Project
The Human Brain Project is one of the European Community flagship projects and involves over 100 groups. Kathinka Evers leads the philosophical research.
Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
Part of BMC Medical Ethics, 2020.
MIND THE RISK · DEN GENETISKA RISKINFORMATIONENS ETIK FÖR INDIVID OCH SAMHÄLLE: SLUTRAPPORT FRÅN ETT FORSKNINGSPROGRAM
Makadam Förlag, 2019.
Research participants' preferences for receiving genetic risk information: a discrete choice experiment
Part of Genetics in Medicine, p. 2381-2389, 2019.
Intellectual Asceticism and Hatred of the Human, the Animal, and the Material
Part of Nordic Wittgenstein Review, p. 43-58, 2018.
Making sense of genetic risk: A qualitative focus-group study of healthy participants in genomic research
Part of Patient Education and Counseling, p. 422-427, 2018.
Can an Ape Become Your Co-author?: Reflections on Becoming as a Presupposition of Teaching
Part of A Companion to Wittgenstein on Education, p. 539-553, 2017.
Freedom of Choice about Incidental Findings can frustrate participants’ true preferences
Part of Bioethics, p. 203-209, 2016.
Incidental Findings: The Time Is not yet Ripe for a Policy for Biobanks
Part of Ethics, Law and Governance of Biobanking, 2015.
The rhetoric and prose of the human/animal contrast
Part of Language & Communication, p. 36-49, 2015.
Being humans when we are animals
Part of Nordic Wittgenstein Review, p. 125-149, 2014.
Thinking about ethics
Why would a cancer patient agree to test a drug that might not be effective on their own disease? And are researchers responsible if their research can be used to develop biological weapons? This collection of texts might not provide the answers, but at least give you some food for thought.
Pär Segerdahl invites you on a journey through some of the issues that the Ethics Blog has dealt with in the recent years. He writes about researchers’ responsibilities, about participating in research and about information and integrity. But he also writes about ethics as such: What is it today, really? In this book you can read about data protection and population based biobank studies. But you can also read about apes writing articles and about the risk with knowing the risk.
Biobank and registry ethics & law
For many years, researchers at CRB have provided constructive advise on how to deal with ethical and legal aspects of research using human tissue material and personal data. We have collaborated with biomedical scientists and published our findings in peer reviewed journals. As a summary of this research we have compiled a list of publications with abstracts. We have grouped them thematically to help you find the ones you might be interested in reading. Our publications deal with ethical frameworks and policy, regulatory aspects of biobank and registry research, informed consent, ethical review, integrity concerns, trust, genetic testing, indicental findings, commercialization, public and patient perceptions, rare diseases, children & biobanks & genetics, and biobank studies.
Philosophy, talking apes and social media
Most of us know Pär Segerdahl from the Ethics Blog where he invites readers to philosophize about research regulation, the meaning of consent, human-animal relationships, and what it means to think. Find out what has to say about philosophy, talking apes and social media.